- Bl tps defend jailbreaker install#
- Bl tps defend jailbreaker update#
- Bl tps defend jailbreaker software#
One is to improve the technical inspection processes for products whose designers provide source code and hardware design specifications, and for products that arrive without any transparency information at all. Technical solutions fall into two basic categories, both currently beyond our reach. Too many back doors can evade this kind of inspection. This is not a worthless gesture, and it helps, but it’s not nearly enough.
Huawei and Kaspersky have offered this sort of openness as a way to demonstrate that they are trustworthy. Policy solutions involve forcing companies to open their technical details to inspection, including the source code of their products and the designs of their hardware. The overall problem is that of supply-chain security, because every part of the supply chain can be attacked.Īnd while nation-state threats like China and Huawei -or Russia and the antivirus company Kaspersky a couple of years earlier -make the news, many of the vulnerabilities I described above are being exploited by cybercriminals. The National Security Agency exploited the shipping process to subvert Cisco routers intended for the Syrian telephone company. Hardware chips can be back-doored at the point of fabrication, even if the design is secure.
Bl tps defend jailbreaker update#
The NotPetya worm was distributed by a fraudulent update to a popular Ukranian accounting package, illustrating vulnerabilities in our update systems.
Bl tps defend jailbreaker software#
Fake apps in the Google Play store illustrate vulnerabilities in our software distribution systems. Open-source software packages are increasingly targeted by groups installing back doors. Thousands of people have the opportunity, acting alone, to slip a back door into the final product. The engineers who design and program them come from over a hundred countries. Their chips aren’t made in the United States. The computers and smartphones you use are not built in the United States. It’s obvious that we can’t trust computer equipment from a country we don’t trust, but the problem is much more pervasive than that. Since the United States will rely on those routers for all of its communications, we become vulnerable by building our 5G backbone on Huawei equipment.
Bl tps defend jailbreaker install#
The government could require Huawei to install back doors into the 5G routers it sells abroad, allowing the government to eavesdrop on communications or -even worse -take control of the routers during wartime. The company is based in China and subject to the rules and dictates of the Chinese government. Solving this problem which is increasingly a national security issue will require us to both make major policy changes and invent new technologies. The United States government’s continuing disagreement with the Chinese company Huawei underscores a much larger problem with computer technologies in general: We have no choice but to trust them completely, and it’s impossible to verify that they’re trustworthy.
0 kommentar(er)
